The United States appealed from orders of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Donald S. Voorhees, J., granting defendants’ suppression motions. The Court of Appeals, J. Blaine Anderson, Circuit Judge, held that action of airline employee in opening a “Speed Pak” was that of a government agent where only reason he opened case was his suspicion that it contained illegal drugs, employee, who at one time had been a listed informant, expected a probable reward from Drug Enforcement Administration, DEA agent testified that such expectation was reasonable and that although agency had no prior knowledge of the particular search and had not directed employee to perform it, it had encouraged him to engage in such types of search and employee had previously opened Speed Paks with no discouragement from the agency and had been rewarded for providing drug information in the past, although his informant’s file had previously been closed.
United States v. Walther, 652 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1981). Full case here: https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-walther
Filed under: 4th Amendment & Searches · Federal Crimes · Drug Charges
Related articles
- Can police search your home if they found a small amount of drugs in your car during a traffic stop?October 9, 2024 · ▶ Video
- DOJ to reclassify cannabis to schedule III, drug priors trigger mandatory min., say sorry to a cop.August 30, 2024 · ▶ Video
- I was just a passenger in the car with secret compartments filled with pounds of drugs. Am I Guilty?August 26, 2024 · ▶ Video
- No way of knowing that drugs found in a trash came from defendant’s residence. Invalid Warrant.August 23, 2024 · ▶ Video

