Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure in San Diego
Defendant Deshawn Hood was charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). His defense centered on the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Hood argued that the September 16, 2019 police stop lacked reasonable suspicion and therefore violated his constitutional rights.
Why the Motion to Suppress Was Granted
The federal court agreed with Hood’s argument. Since the stop was unconstitutional, the court ruled that all evidence obtained—including the firearm—had to be suppressed. This ruling underscores how critical Fourth Amendment search and seizure law in San Diego is for protecting defendants’ rights.
Understanding the Fourth Amendment Standard
The Fourth Amendment guarantees the right of the people to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures. Not every interaction with police is a seizure, but once liberty is restrained through physical force or authority, constitutional protections apply. Courts examine whether a “reasonable person” would feel free to leave under the circumstances.
Case Reference
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DESHAWN HOOD, Criminal No. 19-cr-315 (ESH), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Full opinion here: Read Case Opinion
Anton Vialtsin, Esq.
LAWSTACHE™ LAW FIRM | Criminal Defense and Business Law
https://lawstache.com
(619) 357-6677
More Resources
185 West F Street Suite 100-D
San Diego, CA 92101
The San Diego criminal defense attorneys at LAWSTACHE™ LAW FIRM fight aggressively to defend constitutional rights. If your case involves a possible Fourth Amendment search and seizure violation, call us today.