In South Dakota v. Opperman, the Supreme Court outlined three
justifications for allowing law enforcement officers to inventory lawfully impounded property without first obtaining a warrant.
First, there is a need for law enforcement to protect the owner’s property while it remains in police custody.
Second, an inventory protects the police against claims or disputes over lost or stolen property.
And third, an inventory is necessary for the protection of the police from potential dangers that may be located in the property.
- The vehicle must have been lawfully impounded.
- The inventory search is conducted in accordance with a standardized inventory policy aimed at accomplishing the justifications for
The search must not extend beyond the boundaries reasonably necessary to discover valuables or other items for safekeeping.
Anton Vialtsin, Esq.
LAWSTACHE™ LAW FIRM | Criminal Defense and Business Law
Do you want to buy our Lawstache merchandise? Maybe a t-shirt?
Want to mail me something (usually mustache related)? Send it to 185 West F Street, Suite 100-D, San Diego, CA 92101
Want to learn about our recent victories?
Are you are a Russian speaker? Вы говорите по-русски?
Based in San Diego, CA
Licensed: California, Nevada, and Federal Courts
The San Diego-based business litigation and criminal defense attorneys at LAWSTACHE™ LAW FIRM are experienced and dedicated professionals singularly focused on one goal: achieving the best results for our clients. Through our hard work and expertise, we guarantee all of our clients that we will diligently protect their rights and zealously pursue justice. Our clients deserve nothing less!