Evidence derived from video surveillance of a hotel room was suppressed by the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Thomas S. Zilly, J., and the United States appealed. The Court of Appeals, James R. Browning, Circuit Judge, held that: (1) the Fourth Amendment protects citizens from secret video surveillance in another person’s hotel room without a warrant or the consent of a participant in the monitored activity, and (2) thus, though defendants were invited to a hotel room, rented by government agents, by informants who had consented to video surveillance, once the informants left the room, defendants had reasonable expectation to be free from hidden video surveillance.
Full case here: UNITED STATES v. NERBER, 222 F.3d 597 (2000), https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9997732378699863410&hl=en&as_sdt=6&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
Filed under: 4th Amendment & Searches · Federal Crimes
Related articles
- Were You Within a Mile of a Crime? The Government Wanted Your Phone Location Data. Judge said NO!October 21, 2026 · ▶ Video
- FLOCK CAMERA Searches Violate the 4th Amendment; Federal Judge Throws Out ALL Evidence!October 7, 2026 · ▶ Video
- Can Cops Use a Thermal Camera on Your Home Without a Warrant? | Kyllo v. USJuly 22, 2026 · ▶ Video
- “He Put Stuff in My Room, Bro” — Kid Destroys 4th Amendment Defense (US v. Gatkuoth)June 10, 2026 · ▶ Video

