The Second Amendment is not a “second class right.” No longer can courts balance away a constitutional right. After Bruen, the Government must prove that laws regulating conduct covered by the Second Amendment’s plain text align with this Nation’s historical tradition. The Government does not meet that burden. Although not exhaustive, the Court’s historical survey finds little evidence that § 922(n)—which prohibits those under felony indictment from obtaining a firearm—aligns with this Nation’s historical tradition. As a result, this Court holds that § 922(n) is unconstitutional
Full case here: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOSE GOMEZ QUIROZ, https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txwd.1165328/gov.uscourts.txwd.1165328.82.0.pdf
Filed under: Guns & 2nd Amendment · Federal Crimes
Related articles
- Scratched Serial Numbers Enhancement Does NOT Count If Gun Is Traceable. Glock Machine Gun Switch.September 30, 2026 · ▶ Video
- “He Put Stuff in My Room, Bro” — Kid Destroys 4th Amendment Defense (US v. Gatkuoth)June 10, 2026 · ▶ Video
- San Diego Federal Firearms AttorneyGuide
- Firearm Ban After Domestic Violence? 9th Circuit Shakes Up Federal Firearm Law! #2ndamendmentJuly 9, 2025 · ▶ Video

